emeraldpirate wrote:. Look no further than the locals who take their limit return to their cottages throw them in the freezer and head right back out to take "their limit again". Saw it on a few occasions.
Ding,ding,ding..........Well Said !!!!
emeraldpirate wrote:. Look no further than the locals who take their limit return to their cottages throw them in the freezer and head right back out to take "their limit again". Saw it on a few occasions.
Only people breaking the laws could be subjected to this "authority" you speak of. Law abiding fisherman have nothing to worry about, that's kinda how the whole law thing works.steve2112 wrote:To me this is an example of a regulation where the province is asserting its authority on law abiding fisherman. They do not have a clue how to stop the 1 or 2 percent who do all the damage.
Yes, I believe in Quebec's ability to manage their fisheries and more specifically I believe that recent measures taken by the government stand to improve fish stocks. I believe the measure taken to close trout lakes to winter angling reduces the number of fish being harvested. I believe that the implementation of a zero fish limit stands only to improve the fishery on the handful of decimated lake trout lakes the rule was designed for.steve2112 wrote:My belief is that over regulation makes people cynical and less accepting of new policy that may in fact really be needed. Furthermore, does anyone feel more confident in the government's ability to manage the fishery after they introduce such a measure?
Was this a question or a statement? If you are saying you do catch lake trout without using bait of any sort—much like I do—the argument might be made that we aren't losing much by giving it up but possibly gaining in areas that matter to all fisherman.steve2112 wrote:Anyways I catch lake trout without minnows all the time?
Can`t ice fish at your cottage? Is it on a lake full of lakers?steve2112 wrote:cprince
I could not disagree more...I now have a cottage that I can't ice fish and use minnows ( dead) the rest of the time..
Steve
Just curious; What is it that your catch with dead minnows that you can't catch with something else? What is it that you want to catch that's worth the risk of introduction of invasive species or diseased fish into our lakes and rivers or at very least makes astronomically more difficult to enforce other more important laws and regs to allow certain minnows?steve2112 wrote:bl8nt - no...we are all affected by the regulation as we cannot use dead minnows...
So the assertion of this authority is in the imposition of the regs themselves...I see what you are saying. I don't agree with what you are saying but you made your point well and clearly, gotcha.steve2112 wrote:bl8nt - no...we are all affected by the regulation as we cannot use dead minnows...
The government asserts it authority by its ability to impose regulation, it has nothing to do with the consequence of not following the rules.
The vast vast majority of people will follow the new rule! However, the new rule will not change the behavior of a small minority who do a disproportionate amount of damage!
Sadly, this also creates a false sense of program success because it will be largely driven by people who will comply...no matter what.
Steve
Dead bait can still transmit disease, eg VHS... unless the dead bait is properly preserved / sterilized with salt etcRJ wrote:Lots of passion in this one. I guess all I'd ask anyone is how does a DEAD baitfish harm anything? Dead baitfish isn't invasive to anything that I can see. Maybe I'm missing something, especially when it's suddenly ok at a different time of year?
RJ
Like RJ said, if that's the issue then why is it ok for part of the year?Out4trout wrote:Dead bait can still transmit disease, eg VHS... unless the dead bait is properly preserved / sterilized with salt etc
Simple answer: With these important rules, there is no introduction of minnows, dead or alive, into Quebec lakes that have a native species of lakers.Supernova224 wrote:Like RJ said, if that's the issue then why is it ok for part of the year?Out4trout wrote:Dead bait can still transmit disease, eg VHS... unless the dead bait is properly preserved / sterilized with salt etc
I think that's a couple of times you've mentioned Lake Trout Craig. So what you're saying is these new regs are strictly to protect Laker lakes and to make for easy enforcement they apply it to the whole province even if say you were up in La Verendrye for Pike and Pickerel. Is that right?cprince wrote:Simple answer: With these important rules, there is no introduction of minnows, dead or alive, into Quebec lakes that have a native species of lakers.Supernova224 wrote:Like RJ said, if that's the issue then why is it ok for part of the year?Out4trout wrote:Dead bait can still transmit disease, eg VHS... unless the dead bait is properly preserved / sterilized with salt etc
Since lakes with native lake trout are closed to ice fishing (the only time of year you can use minnows) and the time of year trout fishing is open on these same lakes no minnows dead or alive are permitted.
.smitty55 wrote: I think that's a couple of times you've mentioned Lake Trout Craig. So what you're saying is these new regs are strictly to protect Laker lakes and to make for easy enforcement they apply it to the whole province even if say you were up in La Verendrye for Pike and Pickerel. Is that right?
Cheers