how would you interpret this rule?
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:18 pm
Came across this rule in the mnr book and wonder how one would interpret it... kinda sounds like if the lake is stocked we can access it even threw private property . I know most rules or laws are left to interpretation so this is why I am a bit confused .?
Rules for Stocked Lakes
With Private Access
Lake names printed in “Bold Italics” in the
following fish stocking tables, indicate that access
to these waterbodies is over private land adjacent to
right of ways. Access agreements with the landowners
have allowed these lakes to be stocked for public use.
However, continuation of stocking is dependant upon
the following rules:
• No Fires on the Shore or Ice
• No Cutting of Trees or Other Vegetation
• No Vehicles, snowmobiles or ATVs on the Ice
• No Littering (Clean up before you leave)
• No Vandalism
If the above conditions are violated in anyway, the
stocking of these waterbodies will cease immediately
and access to them across private land will be denied.
Rules for Stocked Lakes
With Private Access
Lake names printed in “Bold Italics” in the
following fish stocking tables, indicate that access
to these waterbodies is over private land adjacent to
right of ways. Access agreements with the landowners
have allowed these lakes to be stocked for public use.
However, continuation of stocking is dependant upon
the following rules:
• No Fires on the Shore or Ice
• No Cutting of Trees or Other Vegetation
• No Vehicles, snowmobiles or ATVs on the Ice
• No Littering (Clean up before you leave)
• No Vandalism
If the above conditions are violated in anyway, the
stocking of these waterbodies will cease immediately
and access to them across private land will be denied.