Would you throw back the big ones?

This is where it's all going on. One can ask for advice or general information or simply chew the fat about fishing tackle, tips, and locations.

Would you participate in throwing the "big ones" back? (Sunfish)

Yes...all the time.
82
71%
Yes...to some degree
25
22%
No...my goal is to catch the big ones
6
5%
No...I don't understand the relevance
3
3%
 
Total votes: 116

User avatar
Chevy Champagne
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1838
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:00 am
Location: ottawa river

Post by Chevy Champagne »

Bass Addict wrote:
Wallyboss wrote: You are starting to sound like somebody else I know!!!!!


Joe Lavoie = Taylor = same guy :twisted:
why are their people like that :shock: :roll:
User avatar
gorfman007
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Ottawa and Bob's Lake

Post by gorfman007 »

Well Joe you and I balance out things Cause my licence is a conservation and I never keep any of my fish and if i have to keep one because of injury the next time i keep even less! :wink: :lol:
Life goes on
User avatar
gorfman007
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Ottawa and Bob's Lake

Post by gorfman007 »

By the way out of curiosity are there any C.O. as members here or maybe visiting :shock: gulp :( :lol:
Life goes on
User avatar
uberfish
Participant
Participant
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:14 pm
Location: Kanata

Post by uberfish »

when I was doing creel survey fro the MNR, I ran into an "angler" who was insistent that the trout limit was river specific, so he could keep 5 from the Credit, 5 from the Wilmot, etc.
If you want a healthy fishery, you know the mantra, limit your keep - don't keep your limit.
User avatar
gorfman007
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Ottawa and Bob's Lake

Post by gorfman007 »

amen to that !! :D
Life goes on
User avatar
legend151
Participant
Participant
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 6:22 pm
Location: Ottawa

Throw the back

Post by legend151 »

As a rule everything I catch is live release, with the exception of being away and having a shore lunch planned which is a rare event. I believe in preserving the spawning fish to keep up the numbers for the future. As for sunfish, we return them all, they are the greatest thing to get kids hooked on fishing and if stocks are depleated, it will become harder for us to get young kids to enjoy angling as much as we do. Besides they are also forage for many larger predatory fish.
User avatar
jimdoglk
Participant
Participant
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:46 pm

Post by jimdoglk »

The gill population is underharvested and are a major predetor of bass fry.There is no legal market in Ontario for them But the 5 gallon bucket gang take a minimal amount in relation to the total population. In NY State they allow the average guy to sell gills and perch and they don't even put a dent in the population.

Ask anyone who fishes small private lakes and they will tell you that the majority of the bass are small. These lakes tend to be over populated and this stunting is the result.
User avatar
Todd B.
Diamond Participant
Diamond Participant
Posts: 2148
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 12:05 pm
Location: Ottawa
Contact:

Post by Todd B. »

jimdoglk,

Contrary to belief, there is a significant harvesting of sunfish in Ontario, and is even harvested commercially. I know of people that are currently on the committee that is formulating the recommendations to give to the Ontario government w.r.t. panfish limits. Based on what I've heard the harvesting is far more extensive than previously throught.

I was told that during a six hour inspection of vehicles leaving Canada via Sarnia, the total sunfish catch by fishermen was estimated to be in the 40,000 fish range. It seems some anglers stock up for an entire year of fish, while others load up a moving truck with coolers full of sunfish for resale, essentially paying for their Canadian vacation.

The notion that fishing pressure on sunfish will not make a dent in their numbers, one only needs to look a Minnesota to see that this is not the case. The catch/possession limit there is now only 20 fish.
"There wouldn't have been any butt kickings if that stupid death ray had worked."
User avatar
Banannie
Participant
Participant
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:31 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Post by Banannie »

Most of the times YES, but you know I do keep some larger fish. For example, Jasonb and I caught a HUGE pike last summer and we got a quick pic and put her back. That is the case most of the time but when I caught my jumbo crappie I kept it for measurements and a tasty meal. I feel that sometimes, when your not being greedy taking home a great fish isn't so bad, just not every time you catch one. If you take and kill a trophy fish think of all the kids and families and serious anglers who could also have a picture of them holding that giant pike, bass, walleye or sunfish and smiling from ear to ear. There is never going to be a law against taking a picture and some quick measurements but if we keep taking home the big ones on a regular basis there will be more regulatory laws on fishing, making it less and less 'free', more stressful, you'll have to remember the constricting limit on each type of fish, it will limit the time allowed to spend having fun. It'll still be fishing, we will still have fun but to know that you are limited, just makes the idea of it less fun. If we don't abuse it, they won't have to regulate it....Simple as that. Creating less stress on YOU while you are doing the thing that is supposed to relax you the most. It's like putting a limit on the ammount of goals you are allowed to get while playing hockey... SO lets not abuse it anymore, be responsible when taking fish home for dinner and they won't have to regulate it.
User avatar
|D4|
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:40 am
Location: In the water

Post by |D4| »

I always put in back the huge ones ! They have been there for a while and probaly dont taste as good a medium sized fish !
User avatar
Banannie
Participant
Participant
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:31 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Post by Banannie »

Ya that was another point that I forgot to make... the small fish are ALWAYS more tasty....mmmm concentrated deliciousness hehe
Post Reply