Strange looking pike.......Help
- valley_boy
- Participant
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:57 pm
- Location: Dunrobin ON
I always assumed it was some sort of infection that had got into a wound. Pike, especially snot rockets, live in some of the most bacterial filled spots on earth. Shallow weedy areas with lots of warm water, dying vegetation, fish etc. If they get a cut its no wonder it would get infected. I know the water is warmer in the summer, but judging by the sixze of that sore, it has likely been there since then. I have seen this similar sort of thing on panfish as well, but they dont seem to swell up as much.
Fellas.....do a bit of reading before you just start throwing fish on the bank because you think it has a disease.....we are not biologists.....
As I said....I've caught several muskies in the Kawarthas with different stages of it....had I thrown them on the bank because I thought they were diseased I'd be tarred and feathered....
RJ
As I said....I've caught several muskies in the Kawarthas with different stages of it....had I thrown them on the bank because I thought they were diseased I'd be tarred and feathered....
RJ
Took me awhile to dig this one up....you can see the scar from a tumor that had fallen off and had nearly healed right up....it was a perfect circle...


The fish is perfectly healthy and destroyed my favorite bucktail...
RJ


The fish is perfectly healthy and destroyed my favorite bucktail...
RJ
Last edited by RJ on Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Walleye kid
- Participant
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:08 am
- Location: Ottawa
GetTheNet!!! wrote:What you saw could have been a lymphosarcoma tumour. The tumours can be fairly common in pike and muskie populations infecting up to 16% of the individuals. It's contagious between fish (pike and muskies) but not to humans.
"Lymphosarcoma is a malignant blood cancer which is highly contagious. The disease is associated with the skin and is manifested by skin lesions and tumours (Figures 7 and. Although some superficial lesions may regress, the tumour usually results in the death of the fish. Sonstegard and Hnath (1978) reported that lymphosarcoma may infect as high as 16% of feral populations of muskellunge."
-Kerr 2004
For images of later stages see page 16
http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/228126.pdf
You hit the nail on the head on this one. The question is, does the MNR know about this in that lake?
- lhousesoccer
- Participant
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:20 am
Yep. As a fisheries biologist, I can definitely tell you it is Esocid Lymphosarcoma. It's a viral infection of the dermal layer. Transferred from fish to fish by direct contact. Not associated with stagnant waters, pollution or chemicals. Tumours will get reabsorbed eventually, but you can usually see where one was - the scales where the tumour was appear "blurry". It doesn't have much of an impact on northern pike populations, but it can kick the crap out of muskie populations.
Here's a good fact sheet on the infection.
http://www.vtfishandwildlife.com/librar ... arcoma.pdf
Here's a good fact sheet on the infection.
http://www.vtfishandwildlife.com/librar ... arcoma.pdf
lhousesoccer wrote:Yep. As a fisheries biologist, I can definitely tell you it is Esocid Lymphosarcoma. It's a viral infection of the dermal layer. Transferred from fish to fish by direct contact. Not associated with stagnant waters, pollution or chemicals. Tumours will get reabsorbed eventually, but you can usually see where one was - the scales where the tumour was appear "blurry". It doesn't have much of an impact on northern pike populations, but it can kick the crap out of muskie populations.
Here's a good fact sheet on the infection.
http://www.vtfishandwildlife.com/librar ... arcoma.pdf
So what is the right thing to do.....throw fish back or keep it....??
Abraxus wrote:Yes, and the hardwater leak at the reactor up river of course has nothing to do with such ailments within the fish population.
I am sure these sorts of things occur naturally, but lets face it, the mighty Ottawa has had a lot horrible stuff dumped in it as of late. I am not talking about what gets left on the ice at Petrie either. Lol There is no way I will ever be convinced that industrial pollutants leaching into our water ways do not effect the species inhabiting them.
Ab
Ya its always nice fishing the 25 miles UPSTREAM from the reactor....eatin lots of mercury pickeral from up there

- lhousesoccer
- Participant
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:20 am
Treat it no different than any other pike. Keep it if you want to eat it (yes, despite the awful appearance, the infection is dermal and doesn't impact the flesh, and the virus is non-transmissable to humans). Throw it back if you don't want to eat it.So what is the right thing to do.....throw fish back or keep it....??
Anglers removing infected fish from the population would almost certainly have no measureable impact to the incidence or prevalence of the disease in a lake.
- Homer Is King
- Participant
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:31 pm
It kind of looks like Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia (VHS). I saw an article on the MNR website about it.(http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/Le ... 66029.html). Just a guess...
- lhousesoccer
- Participant
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:20 am
Best guess is Esocid Lymphosarcoma. I believe it is transmitted by a retrovirus.
http://www.fishingvermont.net/Articles/Lymp-sarco.htm
http://maine.gov/ifw/fishing/health/vol4issue12.htm
http://www.fishingvermont.net/Articles/Lymp-sarco.htm
http://maine.gov/ifw/fishing/health/vol4issue12.htm