Lowrance sonar difficulties in shallow water?
Lowrance sonar difficulties in shallow water?
I've been following the recent threads on walleyecentral.com about the difficulties some Lowrance sonar owners (500 series, LCX27/28/37/38 and even some LCX 112s) are experiencing regarding no depth readings or digital depth flashing in shallow water or in shallow water with a lot of weeds. I've been contemplating upgrading from my 8 year old Lowrance X-85 to the newer technology. Any Fish-Hawkers experiencing such difficulties with their newer Lowrance units? Thanks in advance.
- troutnmuskiehunter
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 3131
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:30 am
- getnjiggywithit
- Bronze Participant
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Ottawa/Kingston
- pikeonthe fly
- Participant
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:02 pm
- Location: Ontario
RJ:
Probably the most informative response is to recommend you read the thread (particularly posts by GBS and yarcraft91) http://www.walleyecentral.com/forums/sh ... 739&page=2
Some guys have been sending their units back to Lowrance requesting analysis or replacement. On 27 Oct 08, Lowrance posted a new 2.4.2 "beta" version of the software on their web site for the 520-series sonars to address the shallow, weedy water operating problems. GBS has tested the beta version and concluded that while it did not eradicate the problem, his sonar (520) performed much better
There appears to be concensus that the preferred Lowrance rep to deal with is Linda Colt (linda.colt@navico.com).
Probably the most informative response is to recommend you read the thread (particularly posts by GBS and yarcraft91) http://www.walleyecentral.com/forums/sh ... 739&page=2
Some guys have been sending their units back to Lowrance requesting analysis or replacement. On 27 Oct 08, Lowrance posted a new 2.4.2 "beta" version of the software on their web site for the 520-series sonars to address the shallow, weedy water operating problems. GBS has tested the beta version and concluded that while it did not eradicate the problem, his sonar (520) performed much better
There appears to be concensus that the preferred Lowrance rep to deal with is Linda Colt (linda.colt@navico.com).
- eye-tracker
- Gold Participant
- Posts: 1998
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 9:23 am
- Location: Perth, Ontario
- Contact:
Lowrance has had a fix for a while on the shallow water issue and I have been using the shallow water setting all this season and part of last season. I even posted a tip on my blog during the summer after fishing in dryden for a week in 1 to 2 feet of water.
http://sheldonhatch.com/blog/?p=91
-sheldon
http://sheldonhatch.com/blog/?p=91
-sheldon
- troutnmuskiehunter
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 3131
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:30 am
Guess you're in the wrong type of weeds RJRJ wrote:My Humminbird 535 has zero issues in shallow water TMH...wonder why yours is....too much of that Constance Bay sand in it...![]()
Great to know Lowrance has fixed this issue through an update...I was thinking of upgrading to a 522C....I just have to tough time justifying it myself....![]()
RJ


- eye-tracker
- Gold Participant
- Posts: 1998
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 9:23 am
- Location: Perth, Ontario
- Contact:
I guess you are in the wrong type of weeds too Lifeisfun...lifeisfun wrote:I got the 575 and no problems like that ...TroutnMuskieHunter wrote:It's not only the Lowrance guys...I have a Humminbird 565 and it does the same thing....it will flash "0" feet until I get past the weeds by the dock in ~ 5 FOW....
Whatever that means...
