Weighing Fish

This is where it's all going on. One can ask for advice or general information or simply chew the fat about fishing tackle, tips, and locations.
Post Reply

What is the WORST way to hook a fish scale to a fish?

Place scale hook "through" (puncture) bottom lip of the fish, hang, and weigh.
27
39%
Place scale hook "in gill plate", (not "on" gills though) hang, and weigh.
28
40%
Use a "weigh bag", placing fish in the bag, scale hook on the bag, and weigh.
12
17%
Use a hanging scale that does not require "hooking" the fish anywhere.
2
3%
There's another worst way that I have seen. (May result in further discussion)
1
1%
 
Total votes: 70

User avatar
Bobber
Diamond Participant
Diamond Participant
Posts: 3182
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 10:40 am
Location: Stittsville, Ontario
Contact:

Weighing Fish

Post by Bobber »

We all want to know just how much a good fish weighs when we hook into one. Naturally the most effective way to do this while on the boat is using either a digital or analog scale that allows you to "hook" the fish in the mouth, and hang it to record it's weight.

This method is effective for smaller fish like Walleye, Bass, and even smaller Pike, but not recommended for larger fish like Lake Trout, Muskie, or Salmon as the pure weight of these fish and the vertical hold may cause further complications with the fish and not allow for a good live release.

For Bass and even Walleye, I've heard several methods for proper "hooking" of the scale on the fish, and would like to know what you think.

So...what's your opinion?
Rob Atkinson
Site Admin (retired)
User avatar
Chewie
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:50 pm
Location: Orleans

Post by Chewie »

I have one of those great flat bottomed rubberized nets. I unhook the fish in the net, then, keeping the poor beast in the net I weigh the fish and net. Works great and their is very little stress on the fish. If it's really worth it they get thier picture taken as well.
User avatar
scooke
Participant
Participant
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:58 pm
Location: NCR

Post by scooke »

When doing research on fish in eastern Ontario, we rarely attempt to obtain mass measurements. Even though mass is highly desirable from a fisheries research perspective, we find that the measurements are usually so sketchy that they don't merit even trying. The weighing procedure tends to extend air exposure and has the potential to generate injury (to mouth or to body if fish is dropped during the process). When we do need a mass measurement we first knock the fish out with anesthetics. So - not very helpful but I guess I am supporting the position that there doesn't seem to be a simple way of obtaining mass of fish while on the water.
S. Cooke
Professor
Biology and Environmental Science
Carleton University
Post Reply